Quiffy wrote:which is it - that he spends too much or too little?
(not aimed at you jackos)
Yeah, I've no idea how these things work, my surprise was an initial reaction to the number "1M a month subsidise the wage bill". Does that mean we're losing 12M a year, or just we haven't had a lot of home games in January, and therefore income is lower than normal. I've understood the wage bill is twice what it was while Max was here, so closer to 40M than 20M, but that turnover is over 50M. I also know we sold players for 30M in the summer, but I assume we don't see all of that straight away ... Bugger knows what the statement means, but Kinnear obviously felt the need to make the number public.