topbin wrote:A week or so ago Yossi Benayoun scored a ridiculous flick in a friendly
gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.
topbin wrote:gazurtoids wrote:
But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.
Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?
As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.
topbin wrote:gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.
But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.
Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?
As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.
eric olthwaite wrote:topbin wrote:gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.
But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.
Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?
As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.
This is just wrong. If you support a shit minor team, and a great big famous team plays you in a friendly, you want them to play the game. Not fuck about and take the piss.
the flying pig wrote:man citeh sign aguero for a £40m fee and about £200k a week wages
to add to their existing complement of strikers [approx reported fee; approx reported wage]:
tevez [well over £20m, over £200k/week];
dzeko [£27m, £100k/week];
balotelli [£22m, £100k/week];
adebayor [a little over £20m, £160k/week]
bellamy [£14m, £90k/week]
santa cruz [etc]
so their strikers will be earning the best part of £1m a week in wages, £50m a year.
looks like the FFP compliance programme is going really well then.
this does have something of the flavour of an awful footballing [quality players in their prime kicking their heels on t'bench] and more obviously monetary waste.
MightyWhite wrote:The Premier League will surely eat itself sooner rather than later.
tommydski wrote:That's one relegation spot sorted already.
moscowhite wrote:We may as well include this here: Blackburn Rovers advertise Venky's chicken in India.
I'm no chef, but if grown men are crossing themselves before tasting your drumsticks, you're not cooking them right.
Banks fold, but almost every tin-pot British football club has survived the Depression, the Second World War, recessions, appalling managers and corrupt chairmen. If football clubs really did collapse under their debts, there would now be almost no football clubs left.
The reason: they are too beloved to go bust. Creditors dare not push them under. No bank manager or tax collector wants to say, “Portsmouth is closing. I’m turning off the lights.” Luckily, society can keep football going fairly cheaply. Contrary to popular opinion, football is not big business. This is a titchy little industry. The total revenues of the whole European professional market in the 2008-09 season were €15.7bn (about £13bn). Tesco’s revenues for 2010 were £57bn.
Fax Man wrote:If anyone hasn't read Simon Kuper's piece in The Blizzard issue one yet, I highly recommend it. Here's a key part, which is perfect for this thread...Banks fold, but almost every tin-pot British football club has survived the Depression, the Second World War, recessions, appalling managers and corrupt chairmen. If football clubs really did collapse under their debts, there would now be almost no football clubs left.
The reason: they are too beloved to go bust. Creditors dare not push them under. No bank manager or tax collector wants to say, “Portsmouth is closing. I’m turning off the lights.” Luckily, society can keep football going fairly cheaply. Contrary to popular opinion, football is not big business. This is a titchy little industry. The total revenues of the whole European professional market in the 2008-09 season were €15.7bn (about £13bn). Tesco’s revenues for 2010 were £57bn.
Kuper's piece is basically saying if you think fees & wages and money in football in general is crazy, that's nothing. If anything, they're only going to get bigger whatever the financial climate.
topbin wrote:Reckon Villa have a good chance of going down too, took them 37 games to be safe and they've sold arguably their two best players. You can still get on them at 18-1.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Terre Harte II and 71 guests