Boring Luton Cyberkop title.

[Devi]

Losing Dallas is a proper ball ache. He's been our best player since the restart IMO.

[Professor Weeto]

Losing Dallas is a proper ball ache. He's been our best player since the restart IMO.

Alioski has made team better every time he's come on since the restart, and he'll presumably come in at left back. It is a shame though as I liked the look of the team (against uber-defensive opposition like Luton, not sure about Blackburn) with Dallas at right back and Ayling at centre back.

[Yeboah]

Losing Dallas is a proper ball ache. He's been our best player since the restart IMO.

Alioski has made team better every time he's come on since the restart, and he'll presumably come in at left back. It is a shame though as I liked the look of the team (against uber-defensive opposition like Luton, not sure about Blackburn) with Dallas at right back and Ayling at centre back.

Hopefully he will play BD at left back. Alioski in front of him and JH on other side so Costa doesn’t have to play.

[Tommy]

Losing Dallas is shite in itself but also losing Alioski coming on off the bench is also a blow.

[BC]

Losing Dallas is shite in itself but also losing Alioski coming on off the bench is also a blow.

Yea, looks a much better player coming on than starting imo.

[Bobbycollins]

I thought that Alioski initially looked a much better player when he was switched to left back and could see the play in front of him that when played as a winger - especially as the offside rule seems to be a mystery to him. He then had a few iffy games and Dallas was switched to LB, where he excelled. I would much prefer to have Alioksi partnered with Harrison that having Douglas play, as the latter struggles to get back if he ever crosses half-way.

[Bobbycollins]

Shock news that floodlights not to blame for Bamford miss https://motleedsnews.com/comment/mot-vi ... w-be-made/

[Quiffy]

from the above article this is fairly interesting..

[Bobbycollins]

from the above article this is fairly interesting..

Not sure I agree with the "fairness" rating though. We conceded both goals as a result of our own mistakes and whilst we may have had 17 shots or whatever, only the attempt that Bamford blocked looked as though it might produce a goal, which may have been disallowed for offside in any event.

[Quiffy]

from the above article this is fairly interesting..

Not sure I agree with the "fairness" rating though. We conceded both goals as a result of our own mistakes and whilst we may have had 17 shots or whatever, only the attempt that Bamford blocked looked as though it might produce a goal, which may have been disallowed for offside in any event.

some say there's lies, damn lies and statistics.

we need a score on your qualitative data otherwise your real life experience? it didn't happen.