Page 39 of 39

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:17 pm
by Musson Grumble
£200k...ridiculous! What did we do?
Break a rule that didn't exist, then create a new rule that potentially acknowledges that 'spying' goes on all the time but now confines it to being unacceptable within a week of the applicable game.
Yeah let's make Leeds pay for the addition to the rule book. After all its got to be 'rewritten now...think of all the typing!
Just heard the 'Moose' on Talksport, apparently the fine is insufficient, we should be docked points, probably about 10, but preferably all 3 points from the games we have won against the 11 complainants, giving them the retribution (is that the right word?) they deserve.
Michael Grey on the panel fighting our corner in response, saying what did they do? And an athlete (forget her name unfortunately), saying; surely in these days of small multiple gains its acceptable.
Once again Leeds stuffed by the powers that be.
Ok, rant over......... £200k is a lot, but let's move on.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:15 pm
by Blackwhite
As someone implied, imagine all the people it will annoy, and work out price per cunt.


Cheap as fuck.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:56 pm
by Mr Reality
Andymac-47 wrote:
Mr Reality wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote:You gotta laugh




I know it's 11%.


If you read that correctly, the boy says "near". It's clearly correct, but being a Maths teacher, I know you couldn't help yourself.


Being somebody with a brain I couldn't help myself.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:59 pm
by Andymac-47
:salute: :salute: :salute:

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:27 pm
by Terre Harte
Musson Grumble wrote:£200k...ridiculous! What did we do?
Break a rule that didn't exist, then create a new rule that potentially acknowledges that 'spying' goes on all the time but now confines it to being unacceptable within a week of the applicable game.
Yeah let's make Leeds pay for the addition to the rule book. After all its got to be 'rewritten now...think of all the typing!
Just heard the 'Moose' on Talksport, apparently the fine is insufficient, we should be docked points, probably about 10, but preferably all 3 points from the games we have won against the 11 complainants, giving them the retribution (is that the right word?) they deserve.
Michael Grey on the panel fighting our corner in response, saying what did they do? And an athlete (forget her name unfortunately), saying; surely in these days of small multiple gains its acceptable.
Once again Leeds stuffed by the powers that be.
Ok, rant over......... £200k is a lot, but let's move on.


It’s not your money so who cares?

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:25 pm
by Blackwhite
Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:30 pm
by Mr Reality
Blackwhite wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.

You only shit your pants once. :D
As far as I'm aware.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:10 pm
by Blackwhite
Mr Reality wrote:
Blackwhite wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.

You only shit your pants once. :D
As far as I'm aware.

And how was it for you?

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:09 pm
by Mr Reality
What you do is your business. :thumbl:

I have no interest.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:43 am
by dirty leeds
Seems to me that Phil Hay has it about right: it's a high, made-up fine that could probably be challenged legally, but we do want the issue to go away so have agreed a 'deal' with the EFL - one where they get to impose something that looks like more than just tokenism, while we get to release a form of words that implies we're not happy, but accepting it so as to move on. Nobody is absolutely satisfied but everyone is satisfied enough to consider it dealt with.

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:06 pm
by jackos
Kinnear lets rip :cheers: :cheers:

'if the EFL had wanted to justifiably deduct Leeds United points, then they should have done so last year for our attempted crest change'!



Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:10 pm
by Devi
:salute:

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:24 pm
by metalsmurf
That I like