Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side
User avatar
Musson Grumble
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:34 pm
Location: Left a bit, no no right, ahh, lovely

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Musson Grumble » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:17 pm

£200k...ridiculous! What did we do?
Break a rule that didn't exist, then create a new rule that potentially acknowledges that 'spying' goes on all the time but now confines it to being unacceptable within a week of the applicable game.
Yeah let's make Leeds pay for the addition to the rule book. After all its got to be 'rewritten now...think of all the typing!
Just heard the 'Moose' on Talksport, apparently the fine is insufficient, we should be docked points, probably about 10, but preferably all 3 points from the games we have won against the 11 complainants, giving them the retribution (is that the right word?) they deserve.
Michael Grey on the panel fighting our corner in response, saying what did they do? And an athlete (forget her name unfortunately), saying; surely in these days of small multiple gains its acceptable.
Once again Leeds stuffed by the powers that be.
Ok, rant over......... £200k is a lot, but let's move on.
Eat more English celery.

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Blackwhite » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:15 pm

As someone implied, imagine all the people it will annoy, and work out price per cunt.


Cheap as fuck.
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

Mr Reality
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Mr Reality » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:56 pm

Andymac-47 wrote:
Mr Reality wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote:You gotta laugh




I know it's 11%.


If you read that correctly, the boy says "near". It's clearly correct, but being a Maths teacher, I know you couldn't help yourself.


Being somebody with a brain I couldn't help myself.

Andymac-47
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 3:06 pm
Location: Belfast

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Andymac-47 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:59 pm

:salute: :salute: :salute:
Andymac

User avatar
Terre Harte
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:08 am
Location: Middle of America

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Terre Harte » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:27 pm

Musson Grumble wrote:£200k...ridiculous! What did we do?
Break a rule that didn't exist, then create a new rule that potentially acknowledges that 'spying' goes on all the time but now confines it to being unacceptable within a week of the applicable game.
Yeah let's make Leeds pay for the addition to the rule book. After all its got to be 'rewritten now...think of all the typing!
Just heard the 'Moose' on Talksport, apparently the fine is insufficient, we should be docked points, probably about 10, but preferably all 3 points from the games we have won against the 11 complainants, giving them the retribution (is that the right word?) they deserve.
Michael Grey on the panel fighting our corner in response, saying what did they do? And an athlete (forget her name unfortunately), saying; surely in these days of small multiple gains its acceptable.
Once again Leeds stuffed by the powers that be.
Ok, rant over......... £200k is a lot, but let's move on.


It’s not your money so who cares?
"If you sell the refrigerator to buy the beer, where the fuck do you put the beer?"

"My only weapon is my pen ... and the state of mind I’m in.”

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Blackwhite » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:25 pm

Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

Mr Reality
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Mr Reality » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:30 pm

Blackwhite wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.

You only shit your pants once. :D
As far as I'm aware.

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Blackwhite » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:10 pm

Mr Reality wrote:
Blackwhite wrote:
Andymac-47 wrote: :salute: :salute: :salute:

Now I'm no maths teacher, so you'll have to help me: I know it's something nil, but I lost count.

You only shit your pants once. :D
As far as I'm aware.

And how was it for you?
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

Mr Reality
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:17 pm

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Mr Reality » Tue Feb 19, 2019 10:09 pm

What you do is your business. :thumbl:

I have no interest.

User avatar
dirty leeds
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:13 pm
Location: London

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby dirty leeds » Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:43 am

Seems to me that Phil Hay has it about right: it's a high, made-up fine that could probably be challenged legally, but we do want the issue to go away so have agreed a 'deal' with the EFL - one where they get to impose something that looks like more than just tokenism, while we get to release a form of words that implies we're not happy, but accepting it so as to move on. Nobody is absolutely satisfied but everyone is satisfied enough to consider it dealt with.

User avatar
jackos
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby jackos » Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:06 pm

Kinnear lets rip :cheers: :cheers:

'if the EFL had wanted to justifiably deduct Leeds United points, then they should have done so last year for our attempted crest change'!



User avatar
Devi
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:15 pm
Location: Crystal Palarse

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby Devi » Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:10 pm

:salute:
I like it. What is it?

User avatar
metalsmurf
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:08 am
Location: Littleborough, Gtr Scumland

Re: Watchers In The Woods v Cunty Frank's Derby Lampstands CK

Postby metalsmurf » Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:24 pm

That I like
Because a thing seems difficult for you, do not think it impossible for anyone to accomplish.


Return to “The Square Ball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Terre Harte II, Tycipa and 11 guests