Mustafaster wrote:This has been done to death for the last six months, hacks rehashing previous stories by other hacks that were rehashed in the first place.
Let me guess.... Picking up litter, blue bucket, Bilbao beating scum, El Loco, Pochetino, Guardiola ...
eric olthwaite wrote:I’ll be honest, though it’s probably a profound heresy to say it on here: every article like this tries to harp on about the ‘character’ of Leeds as a city as though it’s significant.
Now, a few years back, the same kind of articles were being written about Brighton and the Goldstone / lost years / Gillingham / Withdean / Amex / Premiership story, but none of them tried to invoke the ‘character’ of the city of Brighton.
But as a neutral observer it’s clear that Brighton is more ‘unique’ than Leeds if you will; whether it’s the gay scene, the vegans and the green MP, the heroin deaths or just being known as the place to take your PA for a dirty weekend shag. But no one there seems to obsess about Brighton’s identity. It just is what it is.
Bottom line is probably just that Yorkshire obsessives shouldn't be allowed to write about LUFC in the national press.
MightyWhite wrote:I would say the question in the title had been unequivocally answered
Mustafaster wrote:Bielsa's a cunt he's ruined football for me.
There's a very promising match on tonight, Getafe v Alaves, both teams will be up for it, should be entertaining, Samu probabaly get a run out at some point.
Can't be arsed. It's not Leeds.
we need to rename it: "Is Leeds United good enough for that mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football?"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests