YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side
User avatar
Quiffy
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:56 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Quiffy » Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:47 pm

Yeboah wrote:There is potentially a better managed risk approach using the academy. Which then makes the ridiculous investment in Bielsa look....well, even more ridiculous!


surely it makes the bielsa appointment more sensible. we've got some good raw ingredients we need a top chef to make the most of them. bielsa's an investment in the current resources.

as an aside i was wondering what the total costs of the academy have been over the last 20 years compared to the total revenues it has created. i would imagine when you add the fees received for kewell, woodgate, milner, lennon, delph, cook, byram et al it's a tidy little profit. having bielsa coaching this last year will inflate the values of clarke, phillips etc more than enough to cover his additional £2 wages. (presuming you'd want a decent manager who may cost £1m a year)
increasing doubt, decreasing hope, even my imaginary friend went and changed his mind.

Yeboah
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:06 am

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Yeboah » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:09 pm

thestraw wrote:
Yeboah wrote:If we end up in admin or in L1 in the next 24 months i will eat my hat.

Ok, I hope so too...

How do you think it happens then?

Do you dispute the numbers or is promotion almost certain?


I don’t dispute the figures as they are open to see, but we can afford those losses for now without the Club going under like you claim it will. That isn’t even a possibility in the short or medium term.

What I do strongly dispute is the figures being quoted for Bielsa as £6m; as well as the risk you claim it is by handing one of the best coaches in world football another contract for 12 months, that is just an absolute bonkers statement.



Afford it on what basis?

It only happens for one of 2 reasons

- shareholders absorb losses
- bank happy with debt on overdraft or similar

Either of those 2 things could easily change. At which point......well anything could happen.

Saying a champ. Club with a £45m turnover can afford to lose £20-£25m a year is more bonkers than I could ever dream of posting!

£6m for Bielsa includes all his coaching team.

If he was one of the best coaches in world football, at 63 he would:

- have won more
- coached in EPL
- not be at LUFC

His record is what it is....there is nothing hidden.

Yeboah
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:06 am

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Yeboah » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:12 pm

Quiffy wrote:
Yeboah wrote:There is potentially a better managed risk approach using the academy. Which then makes the ridiculous investment in Bielsa look....well, even more ridiculous!


surely it makes the bielsa appointment more sensible. we've got some good raw ingredients we need a top chef to make the most of them. bielsa's an investment in the current resources.

as an aside i was wondering what the total costs of the academy have been over the last 20 years compared to the total revenues it has created. i would imagine when you add the fees received for kewell, woodgate, milner, lennon, delph, cook, byram et al it's a tidy little profit. having bielsa coaching this last year will inflate the values of clarke, phillips etc more than enough to cover his additional £2 wages. (presuming you'd want a decent manager who may cost £1m a year)


Corberan pre dates Bielsa doesn’t he....?

Academy is great undoubtedly, all the players would be worth more automatically if we were EPL.

Who’s to say a different manager wouldn’t do more with the academy resources?

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere
Contact:

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Blackwhite » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:17 pm

Just for a laugh: apart from Colin, who specifically would you prefer as manager Yeboah?
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

User avatar
kennyb41
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:10 am

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby kennyb41 » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:20 pm

Yeboah wrote:Who’s to say a different manager wouldn’t do more with the academy resources?


Ermm, Past history? Fck me we've tried enough have we not over the last few years?
Just coz you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't after you....Show me a good loser and i'll show you a fcking loser...I owe I owe it's off to work I go.

User avatar
jackos
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby jackos » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:27 pm

Yeboah wrote:
Afford it on what basis?

It only happens for one of 2 reasons

- shareholders absorb losses
- bank happy with debt on overdraft or similar

Either of those 2 things could easily change. At which point......well anything could happen.

Saying a champ. Club with a £45m turnover can afford to lose £20-£25m a year is more bonkers than I could ever dream of posting!

£6m for Bielsa includes all his coaching team.

If he was one of the best coaches in world football, at 63 he would:

- have won more
- coached in EPL
- not be at LUFC

His record is what it is....there is nothing hidden.


We haven't lost 20M quid a year. Not yet. We lost <5M last season. We have to wait and see what the loss is this season. EFL rules allow the club to loose 36M over three seasons if the losses are covered by the owner, and that does not include investment in facilities.

Bielsa turned Phillips into a 15M quid player, even if him and his team cost us 6M a season, that alone covers their wages. Added to that we increased our attendances, increase commercial income, went from a club people hadn't forgotten to a club that's in the news every week across the globe, mainly for the right reasons, folks love the football we play.

We're never going to agree, but in a world where Bamford costs us well over 10M over 4 seasons Bielsa and his team are worth 6M a season imho.

User avatar
Oheddieeddie
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 1:35 pm
Location: Tacky with sweat and poisonous particulates.

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Oheddieeddie » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:34 pm

Bielsa and team £3 million is what Hay has said repeatedly

User avatar
jackos
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby jackos » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:44 pm

Oheddieeddie wrote:Bielsa and team £3 million is what Hay has said repeatedly


Thats what I thought, but when Hay was asked he suggested 3M might be net, and that 6M might be gross including pension, taxes etc. We discussed it earlier in the thread. Not 100% clear really.

User avatar
Quiffy
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 6:56 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Quiffy » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:49 pm

Yeboah wrote:
Who’s to say a different manager wouldn’t do more with the academy resources?

well, experience of a load of managers recently, blackwell to heckingbottom, suggests only redfearn was as willing to push the academy as much as bielsa, it's just redders' reputation wasn't anywhere near bielsa's, which will add to the players' value.

fair point about carlos, and therefore orta, i remember loving watching the u23's at the end of last season, but the chances these lads have had in the first team because of bielsa will only add to their value.

the question still remains, who would you rather have? just pointing out the cost of bielsa as a problem suggests there is a better option out there without any problems. i'd love to know who that is. as far as i can see there are drawbacks to every appointment, with marcelo there's just far more positives.
increasing doubt, decreasing hope, even my imaginary friend went and changed his mind.

User avatar
moscowhite
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby moscowhite » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:55 pm

jackos wrote:
Oheddieeddie wrote:Bielsa and team £3 million is what Hay has said repeatedly


Thats what I thought, but when Hay was asked he suggested 3M might be net, and that 6M might be gross including pension, taxes etc. We discussed it earlier in the thread. Not 100% clear really.


That was Phil's attempt to explain where people might have plucked the £6m figure from — he thought, maybe they're adding on pensions and taxes.

The only figure that has come from the club is £3m a year for Bielsa and all his staff. That figure might be a lie. But any other figures are, to whatever degree, guesses.
'If you give Leeds the ball, they will make you dance.' - Johan Cruyff

User avatar
jackos
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby jackos » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:05 pm

moscowhite wrote:The only figure that has come from the club is £3m a year for Bielsa and all his staff. That figure might be a lie. But any other figures are, to whatever degree, guesses.


Yes. Sure, you're correct. I just dont think it matters. What did Cellinos treatment of his staff cost us? How many millions did Orta and Radz waste on transfers their first season at the club? How many millions did/are players signed be previous managers cost us, or cost us to get rid of? Bloody hell, we're probably still paying Robbie Fowler. How many millions did GFH take in "management fees'? Bate's/Cellino's/GFH neglect of TA , or failure to buy TA back? Bates courts cases? I couldn't care less what Bielsa is on, as long as the club think he's worth it and they can afford it. For the first time in, how long? 16 years? We have a manager, owner, and leadership I trust to do their best for the club. Bielsa is worth it. Whatever 'it' might be.

User avatar
Phil LUFC
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: Scunthorpe

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Phil LUFC » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:25 pm

Yeboah wrote:
moscowhite wrote:If the Qataris come in we could still not win promotion despite spending much more, like Derby for the last however many seasons, meaning we would lose even more money each season, building up even larger debts, that the Qataris could decide to stop underwriting at any point, sending the club into admin.

See also: anybody owning any club in the Football League spending any amount.

Or they could get us promoted. But then Radrizzani and Bielsa might do that while building up substantially less debt risk than spending gas millions on players. Who knows? The unpredictability of football is part of its appeal.

The only guaranteed way to guard against scenarios that end in admin is to just close the club down now. Won't lose money then.


Yep, understand the argument.

I think it is generally believed that money talks and success chance is enhanced by money availability. Not always of course but as a ‘most probable’ outcome.

There is potentially a better managed risk approach using the academy. Which then makes the ridiculous investment in Bielsa look....well, even more ridiculous!

I think the widely accepted position is: Bielsa and his full team collectively cost £3m per season. I don't think that's ridiculous.

But...

There's a very strong argument that using the academy is exactly the plan. We got £8m for Vieira last season, we could choose to cash in on Phillips and Clarke for at least £20m, potentially much more if Clarke is genuinely interesting spurs for £15m. This time next summer you could probably add Shackleton and likely someone else. We'll also turn smaller profits from players like Ekuban.

We have a number of other players worth at least £5m in today's market.

Let's say we end next season in the championship, your suggested £50m in debt and Radz has had enough. A handful of player sales negates half of it easily.

Your man Bielsa has likely added £20m to the value of the squad he inherited - he's paid for himself and his staff (£6m over 2 seasons) within Phillips value increase alone.

User avatar
welshwhite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:15 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby welshwhite » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:59 pm

Bielsa alone is on £6m a season, his staff are not included in that figure.
It's a lot of money for just one man to earn but the club were happy to pay it.

The 49ers came in because Bielsa was coach, the money they gave was soley intended to pay for his two year stint here.

He gave half of his first seasons wages to his old club, fair play to the money grabbing fucker :thumbl:

User avatar
AndyPaul
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:27 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby AndyPaul » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:19 pm

Pay him 60 million. I've not enjoyed a season more since we were in the champions league. Looking forward to next season now.

User avatar
LSD&2Es
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Surrey

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby LSD&2Es » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:56 pm

welshwhite wrote:Bielsa alone is on £6m a season, his staff are not included in that figure.
It's a lot of money for just one man to earn but the club were happy to pay it.

The 49ers came in because Bielsa was coach, the money they gave was soley intended to pay for his two year stint here.

He gave half of his first seasons wages to his old club, fair play to the money grabbing fucker :thumbl:



That's bollocks, he's on £60m a season, everyone knows it, its plain for everyone to see. It's all bloody Victor's fault, if he hadn't come over here and taken Gwyns's job, everything would be great!
The Chief: "trust me, you can't have too many years with a club like Leeds."

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere
Contact:

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Blackwhite » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:41 pm

Blackwhite wrote:Just for a laugh: apart from Colin, who specifically would you prefer as manager Yeboah?

Still waiting.
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

User avatar
Tycipa
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:39 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby Tycipa » Tue Jun 11, 2019 9:56 pm

LSD&2Es wrote:
welshwhite wrote:Bielsa alone is on £6m a season, his staff are not included in that figure.
It's a lot of money for just one man to earn but the club were happy to pay it.

The 49ers came in because Bielsa was coach, the money they gave was soley intended to pay for his two year stint here.

He gave half of his first seasons wages to his old club, fair play to the money grabbing fucker :thumbl:



That's bollocks, he's on £60m a season, everyone knows it, its plain for everyone to see. It's all bloody Victor's fault, if he hadn't come over here and taken Gwyns's job, everything would be great!

and he lives in a box in t’middle of t’road the lucky bastard.
The fact that we are not taking care of the planet, our children will pay the consequences. With football it will be the same because we're destroying football and in the future we'll see the negative effects. Those who have power are responsible for it.

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby eric olthwaite » Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:00 pm

AndyPaul wrote:Pay him 60 million. I've not enjoyed a season more since we were in the champions league. Looking forward to next season now.


No. £600m wouldn’t be half enough.
HM Collector Of Parcels

User avatar
welshwhite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:15 pm

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby welshwhite » Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:35 am

LSD&2Es wrote:
welshwhite wrote:Bielsa alone is on £6m a season, his staff are not included in that figure.
It's a lot of money for just one man to earn but the club were happy to pay it.

The 49ers came in because Bielsa was coach, the money they gave was soley intended to pay for his two year stint here.

He gave half of his first seasons wages to his old club, fair play to the money grabbing fucker :thumbl:



That's bollocks, he's on £60m a season, everyone knows it, its plain for everyone to see. It's all bloody Victor's fault, if he hadn't come over here and taken Gwyns's job, everything would be great!


Here's a few signings Williams overseen/discovered and their resale value made a very hefty profit indeed, they also went on to play at a high level.
One of them a Premiership title winner.

Beckford
Snodgrass
Becchio
Gradel
Schmeichel
McCormack
Bradley Johnson.

It's now your turn to give me a list of players Mr. Orta has signed in his time here that will give us a few quid profit should we sell them, or have already sold for a profit.
What little diamonds has he dug up for us?

Even my mate Mr. Cellino was able to make a 12 million quid profit out of the sale of Chris Wood. He bought him for 3m and he was sold for 15m :salute:

User avatar
kennyb41
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:10 am

Re: YES that Mad Bastard Bielsa's brand of football IS good enough for Leeds United

Postby kennyb41 » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:51 am

jackos wrote:
moscowhite wrote:The only figure that has come from the club is £3m a year for Bielsa and all his staff. That figure might be a lie. But any other figures are, to whatever degree, guesses.


Yes. Sure, you're correct. I just dont think it matters. What did Cellinos treatment of his staff cost us? How many millions did Orta and Radz waste on transfers their first season at the club? How many millions did/are players signed be previous managers cost us, or cost us to get rid of? Bloody hell, we're probably still paying Robbie Fowler. How many millions did GFH take in "management fees'? Bate's/Cellino's/GFH neglect of TA , or failure to buy TA back? Bates courts cases? I couldn't care less what Bielsa is on, as long as the club think he's worth it and they can afford it. For the first time in, how long? 16 years? We have a manager, owner, and leadership I trust to do their best for the club. Bielsa is worth it. Whatever 'it' might be.


Fcking spot on :thumbl:
Just coz you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't after you....Show me a good loser and i'll show you a fcking loser...I owe I owe it's off to work I go.


Return to “The Square Ball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: rss1969, sunshine whites and 112 guests