Yeboah wrote:rss1969 wrote:Jack Brooks was sold to Bournemouth for 11.5m aged 21 after 30 apps & 3 goals for Blunts
Jack Clarke has 22 apps & 2 goals for us when 3 years younger than Brooks. Scum & City were sniffing around him before the season even started.
Too right he is worth 15m in that market.
Daniel James was virtually unheard of when we nearly signed him and is also 3 years older than Clarke. If he is worth 15m then Clarke is at least that level.
Assume you mean David Brooks?
Much better player
Automatic first team starter
Clarke has had a handful of decent games, a dodgy illness
And he doesn’t actually look like he could effectively play more than one half of football at even our level.
Comparison is bizarre imo
Far better player according to who? You? Spurs seem to think otherwise.
He was not an automatic starter for Blunts. He scored as a late sub against us, so there is the 1st comparison that works.
Similar amount of games in the same division. Attacking player who can play wide or as AM/ST. How many decent games did he have then or are you his agent as well as coach, pro and analyst?
Both have had their breakthrough seasons, both have had an impact that has alerted PL clubs, Clarke is several years younger which means he is better developed at a younger age..........that puts more of a fee on him not less.
You just want to be in the opposite corner to everyone else no matter how ridiculous you look.