t'premier leeg.

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side
User avatar
topbin
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: Leeds

t'premiership

Postby topbin » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:27 am

Fucking hell, I think people are talking a lot of shite about this. Fair enough if it was a league game, but what's the problem with him trying a fun piece of skill out in a pre-season friendly?

A week or so ago Yossi Benayoun scored a ridiculous flick in a friendly, everyone was creaming themselves about it. It was just as 'disrespectful' as whatever Balotelli tried, it just went in.

User avatar
Tommy
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: UK

Re: t'premiership

Postby Tommy » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:36 pm

topbin wrote:A week or so ago Yossi Benayoun scored a ridiculous flick in a friendly

User avatar
gazurtoids
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:10 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby gazurtoids » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:51 pm

Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.

User avatar
topbin
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: Leeds

t'premiership

Postby topbin » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:59 pm

gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.


But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.

Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?

As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.

User avatar
AndyPaul
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:27 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby AndyPaul » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:31 pm

topbin wrote:
gazurtoids wrote:
But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.

Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?

As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.


I think the fact that as soon as he did it he was booed, his team mates were furious, he was then booed off as his pissed off manager subbed him and then threw a childish strop may have prooved that pretty much everyone there thought he was a complete cock.

I don't think many of those booing fans thought much if the effort.

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: t'premiership

Postby eric olthwaite » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:34 pm

topbin wrote:
gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.


But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.

Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?

As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.


This is just wrong. If you support a shit minor team, and a great big famous team plays you in a friendly, you want them to play the game. Not fuck about and take the piss.
Member of a clique

Fax Man
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: t'premiership

Postby Fax Man » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:38 pm

In defence of Balotelli, I wonder if he thought he was offside. That seems to be what he says to Mancini when he comes off and it would explain why he didn't put any effort into the back heel which was nowhere near on target.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oytEUmlkHo

User avatar
Mustafaster
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 am
Location: PC Brigade House.

Re: t'premiership

Postby Mustafaster » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:38 pm

eric olthwaite wrote:
topbin wrote:
gazurtoids wrote:Nah, that's not the point. The ends don't justify the means. Ballotelli's effort was wrong because there were better options (shooting without pirouetting, passing to Dzeko). Benayoun's flicks were speculative efforts while on the run; there weren't a host of simpler options and the goal was not already at his mercy. That's the difference.


But it's a friendly game. There's nothing at stake. The fans have gone to watch some of the best footballers in the world play football. If I was there, I'd much rather have seen him fluff an audacious backheel than simply slip it past the keeper.
It's not like Balotelli needs to score to get some confidence, Christ knows he has enough of that.

Scoring goals clearly isn't the objective of those games - teamwork, fitness and entertaining are.
He can make that pass to Dzeko 100 times out of 100, why bother practicing it?

As for Mancini's comments after the game, he should be ashamed of himself.


This is just wrong. If you support a shit minor team, and a great big famous team plays you in a friendly, you want them to play the game. Not fuck about and take the piss.

Even worse if that " great big famous team" is Citeh. :elephant:
Mirrors and copulation are abominable, since they both multiply the numbers of men.

User avatar
the flying pig
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:24 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby the flying pig » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:26 pm

man citeh sign aguero for a £40m fee and about £200k a week wages

to add to their existing complement of strikers [approx reported fee; approx reported wage]:

tevez [well over £20m, over £200k/week];
dzeko [£27m, £100k/week];
balotelli [£22m, £100k/week];
adebayor [a little over £20m, £160k/week]
bellamy [£14m, £90k/week]
santa cruz [etc]


so their strikers will be earning the best part of £1m a week in wages, £50m a year.

looks like the FFP compliance programme is going really well then.

this does have something of the flavour of an awful footballing [quality players in their prime kicking their heels on t'bench] and more obviously monetary waste.

User avatar
The Gentleman Thug
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:40 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby The Gentleman Thug » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:22 pm

the flying pig wrote:man citeh sign aguero for a £40m fee and about £200k a week wages

to add to their existing complement of strikers [approx reported fee; approx reported wage]:

tevez [well over £20m, over £200k/week];
dzeko [£27m, £100k/week];
balotelli [£22m, £100k/week];
adebayor [a little over £20m, £160k/week]
bellamy [£14m, £90k/week]
santa cruz [etc]


so their strikers will be earning the best part of £1m a week in wages, £50m a year.

looks like the FFP compliance programme is going really well then.

this does have something of the flavour of an awful footballing [quality players in their prime kicking their heels on t'bench] and more obviously monetary waste.


Adebayor's not on £160K a week is he? Fuck the PL and all who support her. Let's never go back there.

I think I hate Man City more than Man Utd now.

User avatar
MightyWhite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:38 am
Location: Notts

Re: t'premiership

Postby MightyWhite » Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:53 am

The Premier League will surely eat itself sooner rather than later.
Keep Fighting

User avatar
Mustafaster
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 am
Location: PC Brigade House.

Re: t'premiership

Postby Mustafaster » Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:08 am

MightyWhite wrote:The Premier League will surely eat itself sooner rather than later.

We wish.
£lite football is a vanity project for the super rich.

"Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has reported a 77% jump in second-quarter profit, thanks to higher energy prices.
Shell's profit for the three months to June came in at $8bn (4.9bn) on a current cost of supplies basis, up from $4.5bn in the same period last year."

8 billion dollars profit in 3 fuckin months! And RDS is a middling sized energy company. Footballers' wages don't even register in the petty cash.
:pig:
Mirrors and copulation are abominable, since they both multiply the numbers of men.

User avatar
moscowhite
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: t'premiership

Postby moscowhite » Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:51 pm

We may as well include this here: Blackburn Rovers advertise Venky's chicken in India.

I'm no chef, but if grown men are crossing themselves before tasting your drumsticks, you're not cooking them right.
'If you give Leeds the ball, they will make you dance.' - Johan Cruyff

User avatar
Tommy
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: UK

Re: t'premiership

Postby Tommy » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:02 pm

That's one relegation spot sorted already.

User avatar
topbin
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: t'premiership

Postby topbin » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:05 pm

tommydski wrote:That's one relegation spot sorted already.


Aye. I got 5-1 on them being relegated this season, it's already shortened to 3-1.

Reckon Villa have a good chance of going down too, took them 37 games to be safe and they've sold arguably their two best players. You can still get on them at 18-1.

User avatar
the flying pig
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:24 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby the flying pig » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:14 pm

moscowhite wrote:We may as well include this here: Blackburn Rovers advertise Venky's chicken in India.

I'm no chef, but if grown men are crossing themselves before tasting your drumsticks, you're not cooking them right.

pff. as if robbo or dunny would sit back politely whilst team-mates helped themselves to tasty chicken :chef:

Fax Man
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: t'premiership

Postby Fax Man » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:19 pm

If anyone hasn't read Simon Kuper's piece in The Blizzard issue one yet, I highly recommend it. Here's a key part, which is perfect for this thread...

Banks fold, but almost every tin-pot British football club has survived the Depression, the Second World War, recessions, appalling managers and corrupt chairmen. If football clubs really did collapse under their debts, there would now be almost no football clubs left.
The reason: they are too beloved to go bust. Creditors dare not push them under. No bank manager or tax collector wants to say, “Portsmouth is closing. I’m turning off the lights.” Luckily, society can keep football going fairly cheaply. Contrary to popular opinion, football is not big business. This is a titchy little industry. The total revenues of the whole European professional market in the 2008-09 season were €15.7bn (about £13bn). Tesco’s revenues for 2010 were £57bn.


Kuper's piece is basically saying if you think fees & wages and money in football in general is crazy, that's nothing. If anything, they're only going to get bigger whatever the financial climate.

User avatar
the flying pig
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:24 am

Re: t'premiership

Postby the flying pig » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:23 pm

Fax Man wrote:If anyone hasn't read Simon Kuper's piece in The Blizzard issue one yet, I highly recommend it. Here's a key part, which is perfect for this thread...

Banks fold, but almost every tin-pot British football club has survived the Depression, the Second World War, recessions, appalling managers and corrupt chairmen. If football clubs really did collapse under their debts, there would now be almost no football clubs left.
The reason: they are too beloved to go bust. Creditors dare not push them under. No bank manager or tax collector wants to say, “Portsmouth is closing. I’m turning off the lights.” Luckily, society can keep football going fairly cheaply. Contrary to popular opinion, football is not big business. This is a titchy little industry. The total revenues of the whole European professional market in the 2008-09 season were €15.7bn (about £13bn). Tesco’s revenues for 2010 were £57bn.


Kuper's piece is basically saying if you think fees & wages and money in football in general is crazy, that's nothing. If anything, they're only going to get bigger whatever the financial climate.


aye. i made the same point back in feb, mind.

http://www.thesquareball.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=104036#p104036

User avatar
Tommy
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:07 pm
Location: UK

Re: t'premiership

Postby Tommy » Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:44 pm

topbin wrote:Reckon Villa have a good chance of going down too, took them 37 games to be safe and they've sold arguably their two best players. You can still get on them at 18-1.

Nah, I don't see it. Even without Downing and Young they have a good side, especially with the addition of N'Zogbia. Bannan, Albrighton, Delph, Makoun and Agbonlahor are all good players and they don't really have any truly awful players in the squad.

QPR and Blackburn seem like the most likely candidates and this might even be the year that Wigan's luck runs out. I think Wolves, Norwich and Swansea will survive though.

User avatar
MightyWhite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:38 am
Location: Notts

Re: t'premiership

Postby MightyWhite » Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:00 am

I suspect Villa will be ok, mainly due to the fact they have a very good striker (Bent) and a not-awful defence. Their midfield is pretty wank now though.
Keep Fighting


Return to “The Square Ball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jackos, MightyWhite, Professor Weeto, Terre Harte II and 40 guests