Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Discussion on LUFC and absolutely anything... welcome to the Dark Side
User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Sat Feb 01, 2020 12:50 pm

jackos wrote:
Mustafaster wrote:Are you a Christian?


I am. Nothing in Christs teachings was even slightly homophobic as far as I know?


Hmmm. I get that the Old Testament is not Christ’s teaching as such, but it’s still recognised by the Christian church, no?

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them." Chapter 20 verse 13


But the wider point is that if Folau identifies as a Christian and is homophobic and you identify as a Christian and are not homophobic, it can only be that one of you is wrong or that Christianity is vague and indeterminate.
Member of a clique

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Sat Feb 01, 2020 12:54 pm

the flying pig wrote:
eric olthwaite wrote:
the flying pig wrote:it's unfortunate that, via social media, someone as ignorant as him has a platform to spew out this kind of nonsense.


This is the nub. 20 years ago he’d have been an ignorant berk and no one would have known. But at the very least any club signing him should say it’s a condition of his contract that he stays the fuck off social media.


well - if you went back very much more than 20 years, his views would have been socially acceptable in even the most liberal societies.


Bit strawman-y there. My point was to do with his personal capacity to disseminate his POV.
Member of a clique

jackos
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Stockholm

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby jackos » Sat Feb 01, 2020 1:03 pm

eric olthwaite wrote:Hmmm. I get that the Old Testament is not Christ’s teaching as such, but it’s still recognised by the Christian church, no?


Think there's a lot of shit in the old testament that contradicts Christ's teachings? Not much turning the other cheek for starters.
Traditional Socialist Bastard

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:36 am

Made me laff:

Member of a clique

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:46 am

Wild example of an Australian being interesting. Watch ‘til the end:

Member of a clique

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere
Contact:

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Blackwhite » Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:10 am

What did I miss at the end
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:24 am

The pen bit
Member of a clique

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere
Contact:

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Blackwhite » Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:50 am

Ok, I thought that was normally part of the demo of that. No probs.
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

User avatar
kennyb41
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:10 am

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby kennyb41 » Sun Feb 02, 2020 2:33 pm

In the past you would get put away for that you know.
Just coz you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't after you....Show me a good loser and i'll show you a fcking loser...I owe I owe it's off to work I go.

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:45 am

In which your correspondent wrote:

eric olthwaite wrote:Signing him is just dumb. There's fuck all money in professional rugby and any protest that comes from this will only damage the game and the club.


And in which it now turns out that Hull KR have issued notice against the Super League in the event of financial loss

A stopped clock etc.
Member of a clique

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Thu Feb 06, 2020 5:00 pm

I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?
Member of a clique

User avatar
Ponte
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:36 am
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Ponte » Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:19 pm

eric olthwaite wrote:I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?

I once had to send three copies of a certificate for the same item in pdf format. Apparently asking them to download the document on the email three times was not in agreement with the terms of the purchase. Attaching the same document three times was.

London_White
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: exiled in west sussex

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby London_White » Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:53 pm

eric olthwaite wrote:I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?

Mate, I work in part of the banking sector, in order to make our bulk cash movements we have to have two people sign a document, we then scan and email it to the centre making the move, they then email us back with the unique code at the top of the form and email a scanned copy of the signed coversheet we send them.
All this could be achieved with some simple encryption software but the banks won't pay for it. Admittedly there are some fairly sizeable sums involved but really, email is supposedly safer than encryption? Madness I tell ya

User avatar
Blackwhite
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Arse end of nowhere
Contact:

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Blackwhite » Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:08 pm

Unsecured email is like postcards to each other. Jesus.
You know, I'm sick of following my dreams, man. I'm just going to ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later.

Yeboah
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:06 am

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Yeboah » Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:11 pm

eric olthwaite wrote:I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?


So you were asked to do one specific thing, didn’t do it and now it’s their fault?

Yep sounds about right for you.

It may well be a pointless nonsensical task, but the time to raise the objection is before doing it wrong....not after.

User avatar
Ontolly
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:36 pm
Location: gone

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Ontolly » Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:02 pm

Yeboah wrote:
eric olthwaite wrote:I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?


So you were asked to do one specific thing, didn’t do it and now it’s their fault?

Yep sounds about right for you.

It may well be a pointless nonsensical task, but the time to raise the objection is before doing it wrong....not after.


This. A legal term such as receiving a signed copy leaves the door open to Philadelphia lawyers if what was supplied was a copy of a signed copy. Possibly.
The only thing we knew for sure about Henry Porter was that his name wasn't Henry Porter.

User avatar
eric olthwaite
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Over there, behind that bush

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby eric olthwaite » Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:43 pm

Christ, it’s like Yeboah goes out of his way to demonstrate he’s dumber than anyone else. Where did I say what I was asked for?
Member of a clique

User avatar
kennyb41
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:10 am

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby kennyb41 » Fri Feb 07, 2020 6:31 am

Yeboah wrote:
eric olthwaite wrote:I’m getting severe earache today on account of having supplied three copies of a signed contractual document, as opposed to three signed copies.

I put it to you gentlemen, that in these days of electronic communications and filing, the actual material difference between the two is slightly less than fuck all and archaic pseudo-legal nonsense.

Happy to be shown otherwise but this is bullshit, no?


So you were asked to do one specific thing, didn’t do it and now it’s their fault?

Yep sounds about right for you.

It may well be a pointless nonsensical task, but the time to raise the objection is before doing it wrong....not after.


:mrgreen:
Just coz you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't after you....Show me a good loser and i'll show you a fcking loser...I owe I owe it's off to work I go.

User avatar
Ponte
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:36 am
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Ponte » Fri Feb 07, 2020 7:30 am

eric olthwaite wrote:Christ, it’s like Yeboah goes out of his way to demonstrate he’s dumber than anyone else. Where did I say what I was asked for?

The fact he still posts his opinion despite rarely getting any kind of response shows he only cares what he thinks.
Very odd.

User avatar
Devi
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:15 pm
Location: Crystal Palarse

Re: Entirely SFW Random Link Thread

Postby Devi » Fri Feb 07, 2020 10:07 am

This is where we are with deep fakes.

WTAF... :shock:

https://www.thispersondoesnotexist.com/
I like it. What is it?


Return to “The Square Ball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eddies Boots, Proud to be Leeds and 76 guests