People compare chess and cricket a lot. I don't see it. I'm a keen chess player. If someone told me I had to play them at chess on an airbed in a tsunami, because they had home advantage and it was their choice, I'd tell them to piss off.
People compare chess and cricket a lot. I don't see it. I'm a keen chess player. If someone told me I had to play them at chess on an airbed in a tsunami, because they had home advantage and it was their choice, I'd tell them to piss off.
Bobbycollins wrote:At the end of the England innings I heard Emily Rainford Whatever express the opinion that England had chosen the wrong strategy by packing the batting and leaving the bowling too thin. I don't agree as I thought Archer did nothing with either bat or ball in the previous test and whilst Broad's bowling was OK, he didn't look likely to get a wicket and his batting is now very suspect. I don't have a great deal of confidence in Bess as yet but I think a 3 man spin bowling line up including Root has more chance of taking wickets than would be the case by adding an additional seam bowler. Moreover we need to pick 7 batsmen to ensure that at least 3 get double figures.
Proud to be Leeds wrote:Half a bail wasn't it? Toughie.
dirty leeds wrote:We just lost the match in the last 90 minutes. Shame, really: we had 'em going.
dirty leeds wrote:Haven't turned the telly on yet. Hoping I might miss it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests