Devi wrote:Anyone got a theory as to what Southgate was there for? Apart from assessing Dallas, obvs.
Devi wrote:Yep agree with that
Anyone got a theory as to what Southgate was there for? Apart from assessing Dallas, obvs.
Phil LUFC wrote:He doesn't fit in our best XI for me but I fear he's very much in Bielsa's. I don't rate him but somewhere in there is the guy who scored 2 high class goals at Burnley last season. I want to see more of that guy.
BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:Phil LUFC wrote:He doesn't fit in our best XI for me but I fear he's very much in Bielsa's. I don't rate him but somewhere in there is the guy who scored 2 high class goals at Burnley last season. I want to see more of that guy.
Yes, but that's just it, that player you saw was playing up front. We're short of strikers, so he should have put him up front, not James. He should have sacrificed one of the wingers.
Sometimes I think Bielsa wants to please or fit everyone in. He needs to be more ruthless.
Phil LUFC wrote:BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:Phil LUFC wrote:He doesn't fit in our best XI for me but I fear he's very much in Bielsa's. I don't rate him but somewhere in there is the guy who scored 2 high class goals at Burnley last season. I want to see more of that guy.
Yes, but that's just it, that player you saw was playing up front. We're short of strikers, so he should have put him up front, not James. He should have sacrificed one of the wingers.
Sometimes I think Bielsa wants to please or fit everyone in. He needs to be more ruthless.
I think the first requirement for a Bielsa striker is the pressing. James can do that really well and I think that's why he gets the nod. I think it's also why Roberts plays there ahead of Rodrigo.
Rodrigo does it that little bit slower, doesn't bother at all more often and has almost zero chance of winning the ball if he does get there in time.
Ideally he's a player who comes on when we're already winning to exploit the spaces on the break against a team over committing. Otherwise, I imagine he'd be perfect for a team good enough to have 70% possession and play almost entirely on the front foot.
Mustafaster wrote:Or why not do something really radical and play a striker in the striker role?
Phil LUFC wrote:I think the first requirement for a Bielsa striker is the pressing. James can do that really well and I think that's why he gets the nod. I think it's also why Roberts plays there ahead of Rodrigo.
Mustafaster wrote:Or why not do something really radical and play a striker in the striker role?
Ponte wrote:The pressing is very important but the amount of times we play good balls into the box to where a CF should be and nobody is there is criminal.
Separate point but one that annoys me is that James also needs to watch some videos of us last year and in the championship and see how good pulling the ball back can be.
BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:Ponte wrote:The pressing is very important but the amount of times we play good balls into the box to where a CF should be and nobody is there is criminal.
Separate point but one that annoys me is that James also needs to watch some videos of us last year and in the championship and see how good pulling the ball back can be.
True in regards to Dan's passing, but he played a peach of a pass in the box in the second half and ironically coming back to your first point, nobody was there to tap it in.
Need a proper striker. Seems Tommy was right, Bamford could be out for the rest of the season. (angry face).
BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:
I'm in agreement Phil, but there's no point in pressing (James & Tyler), when you score fk all goals. Rodrigo is a striker (I think) the other 2 aren't.
Or maybe drop Rodrigo & put Jackie up front who can actually score & James on the wing. He's said in the past that Jackie can play up front, why not try it.
Phil LUFC wrote:BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:
I'm in agreement Phil, but there's no point in pressing (James & Tyler), when you score fk all goals. Rodrigo is a striker (I think) the other 2 aren't.
Or maybe drop Rodrigo & put Jackie up front who can actually score & James on the wing. He's said in the past that Jackie can play up front, why not try it.
I'm not convinced Harrison is any more suited to it in truth. At this stage the answer should be simple: Play Gelhardt there.
I agree we should be using Rodrigo as a striker (or not at all) and not as a #10. Our #10 role under Bielsa has always been creative midfielder rather than 2nd striker, even if we've often played a striker there.
Hopefully we get this lad from Salzburg and then Bielsa feels obligated to play him in the way he seemingly feels obligated to play Rodrigo.
dirty leeds wrote:Sounds like we're not, though? Last I read was they won't sell until summer.
Phil LUFC wrote:BARE-NAKED-LADY wrote:Phil LUFC wrote:He doesn't fit in our best XI for me but I fear he's very much in Bielsa's. I don't rate him but somewhere in there is the guy who scored 2 high class goals at Burnley last season. I want to see more of that guy.
Yes, but that's just it, that player you saw was playing up front. We're short of strikers, so he should have put him up front, not James. He should have sacrificed one of the wingers.
Sometimes I think Bielsa wants to please or fit everyone in. He needs to be more ruthless.
I think the first requirement for a Bielsa striker is the pressing. James can do that really well and I think that's why he gets the nod. I think it's also why Roberts plays there ahead of Rodrigo.
Rodrigo does it that little bit slower, doesn't bother at all more often and has almost zero chance of winning the ball if he does get there in time.
Ideally he's a player who comes on when we're already winning to exploit the spaces on the break against a team over committing. Otherwise, I imagine he'd be perfect for a team good enough to have 70% possession and play almost entirely on the front foot.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests